» Presidentâ€™s Admission Fuels Privacy ConcernsTelecommunications Industry News

Telecom News Editorials Reports Glossary

Presidentâ€™s Admission Fuels Privacy Concerns

9:30 am on December 18, 2005 | Category: Editorials, Email, Law, Regulation, Telecom Services, Telephone

There is little doubt that this slow and quiet weekend before Christmas has aroused great deal of passion and concern around the relationship between government and communication privacy.

After years of denial, it has finally come out that Americaâ€™s Republican government is spying on the telephone and email communications of, well, whomever they feel like. And what makes it worse still is that they have absolutely no warrant â€“ no legal justification to be doing this.

This renews the frequently asked, yet never properly answered question of just how far governments can go in the ongoing quest to fight terrorism. President Bush claims that wiretapping technology is essential in smoking out terrorist factions, and bringing them to justice, but should ordinary Americans have to worry about being spied on by their own government?

And I should hasten to remind you that the US Republican Party isnâ€™t the only government intent on monitoring everyday communication channels. Before being ousted by a non-confidence vote, Canadaâ€™s Liberal government was trying to pass legislation that would allow them to spy on up to 8000 people at any given time, and force telephone companies and ISPs to reveal the personal information of customers without so much as a warrant.

So it seems that this type of policy exists outside the political spectrum, with parties from both sides advocating that the privacy rights of citizens be flushed down the toilet.

All we can really hope for is that governments will be overcome with increasing pressure from citizens who have an interest in keeping their right to communicate in private and in peace.

So whether you are Canadian or American, Liberal or Conservative, Democrat or Republican, I would strongly encourage you to write to your local representative, and ask them what they intend to do to defend your privacy.

We need to remember that there are other ways to fight the terrorist threat without blatantly infringing upon the very human dignities and freedoms that we all want to defend.

None Found

3 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

[...] The illegal wiretapping program set up by the U.S. government is much more extensive than originally thought. New details have surfaced showing that the National Security Agency has been secretly collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of law abiding Americans. [...]

Pingback by U.S. Government Wiretapping Gets Out of Hand » Telecommunications Industry News — May 12, 2006 #
OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT: KENOSHA COUNT 912 56th St. KENOSHA, WISCONSIN 53140 File No.
JAN 2 4 2008
Darryl Kinney Plaintiff SUMMONS
VS. REBECCA MATOSKA-MENTINK
ILLINOIS DEPT. OF REVENUE UNITED
1 00 W. RANDOLPH 950 PENNSYVANIA AVE. NW CIVIL: _
CHICAGO, ILL. 60601 WASHINGTON, D.C, 20530-0001
, Defendants
08CV0196
THE STATE OF WISCONSIN, To each person named above as a Defendant:
You are hereby notified that the Plaintiff named above has filed a lawsuit or other legal action against you.
The complaint, which is also served upon you, states the nature and basis of the legal action. Within 45
days after 1/24. 2008. you must respond with a written answer, as that term is used in chapter 802 of the
Wisconsin Statutes, to the complaint. The court may reject or disregard an answer that does not follow the
requirements of the statutes.The answer must be sent or delivered to the court, whose address is 912 56th St.
Room 204. and to Darryl Kinnev. Plaintiff, whose address is 7301 98th Ave. Unit D Kenosha.WI. 53142.
You may have an attorney help or represent you. If you do not provide a proper answer within 45 days,
the court may grant judgment against you for the award of money or other legal action requested in the
complaint, and you may lose your right to object to anything that is or may be incorrect in the complaint.
A judgment may be enforced as provided by law. A judgment awarding money may become a lien against
any real estate you own now or in the future, and may also be enforced by garnishment or seizure of property.
Dated: 1/24 2008
Signed: ^) _ Tx. …… â€”
Darryl Kinney., Plaintiff Pro Se
Address:7301 98th Ave. unit D,Kenosha,WI. 53142
Phone No.: 262-237-1310
NOTE: Sub. (3) is shown as affected by two acts of the 1997 legislature and as merged by the revisor under s. 13.93 (2) (c). 801.095 – ANNOT. NOTE: 1999 Wis. Act 32 mistakenly stated “40 days” ratherthan “45 days” in the 3rd full paragraph of the form. The form is printed here with the correct number. Legislation is pending that confirms that no change to the 3rd paragraph of the form was intended.

Comment by DARRYL — February 3, 2008 #
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DIVISION OF WISCONSIN
EASTERN DIVISION

Darryl Kinney )
Jada Kinney ) CASE # 08-C-0460
v. )
U.S. Dept. of Justice ) JUDGE: Charles N. Clevert Jr.
& )
I.R.S )
___________________)
PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Darryl Kinney(“Kinney”) and Jada Kinney against the Defendants by himself,

hereby files his Amended Complaint against the Defendants U.S. Dept. of Justice(“DOJ”) the I.R.S. which

includes the U.S. Navy and the F.B.I. all hailing from Wisconsin and Illinois Plaintiffs allege as follows:

NATURE OF THIS ACTION
1. This is an action that arises under Title VII of the Civil Rights A ct of 1964,
42 U.S.C. Â§Â§ 2000e, et seq., as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and under 42 U.S.C.
Â§ 1981.because both Kinney’s are African Americans,.Racial Discrimination.
2. Stalker laws ( WIS. Statute 940.32, 214 Wis. 2d 548,571)
3. Harrassment laws ( Wis. Statute 947.013)
4. Internet fraud ( Fake websites hacking, Fed.Statute Ann. 254 U.S. 17,41 S.Ct. 11 65 U.S.,
5. Section 1030 of the Computer Fraud and abuse Act)
6. Child questioning ( discretion of the court since none specific)
7. Mental Anguish (254 U.S. 17, 41 Sup. Ct. 11,65 U.S.)
8. Employment harassment(Fake customers and Coercing)
9. Corruption of Government Agencies(EEOC, Unemployment)
10. Conspiracy (Wis. Statute 939.31, 18 U.S.C 371)
11. Abuse of Power (title 18 sections 241-242 U.S.C, Title 42, section 1983)
12. Telephone tapping (Wis. Statute 885.365)
13. Mental and Physical abuse( 750 ILCS 60/103)
THE PARTIES
14. Plaintiffs Darryl Kinney and Jada Kinney are both African American citizens who reside in Wisconsin
and Illinois cities of Kenosha and Waukegan.
15. Defendants D.O.J. is an agency established under the Laws of the United States and Wisconsin and Illinois
with an office located at 114 E. Capitol Dr, Madison , Wisconsin.
16. Defendants I.R.S. is an agency established under the laws governed by the United States and Wisconsin and
Illinois with an office at 545 Zor Shrine Dr. Madison, Wisconsin.
17.At all relevant times D.O.J. acted thru its agents utilizing the U.S. Navy active and retireed duty, including
Katrina Kigoda and the Kenosha and Waukegan Police Dept..
18. At all relevant times the I.R.S. used its agents and those of the U.S. Navy active and retired duty
and the Kenosha and Waukegan Police Dept..
19. Both the D.O.J. and the I.R.S. have headquarters in Wisconsin and Illinois. With over 100 employees an
at all relevant times subject to all Federal and State laws forementioned.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
20. This court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.Â§Â§ 1331, 1343.
21. This court also has supplemental jurisdiction over Kinneys state and common law claims pursuant to
28 U.S.C. Â§Â§ 1367(a)
22. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C.Â§Â§ 1391(b)
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

23. Kinney’s also allege violations under the laws of the State of Wisconsin.

24. This action also violates the EEO laws in Wisconsin.

25. Also unlawful surveillance home and at work and illegal harassment on the job and
private life. 26.Plaintiff had fake customers on the job calling with phony complaints as work was sabotaged by these Defendants.
27. Both Kiimey’s have experiences emotional and Jada Simone Kimiey has experienced physical abuse
by family set into motion by these organizations.
28. This action also includes defamation of character.
29. In mid-2007 thru 2008 direct or indirect harassment was caused at Plaintiffs employer, thru actions
causing mental harassment, by tearing up Plaintiffs truck by Sears manager, message left was taped by
Plaintiff of this action.
30. In 2008 mid year Plaintiffs family was led to attempt making false claims about plaintiff
in emails by direct or indirect contact from the defendants.
31. Plaintiffs computer has been hacked daily and destroyed to try to keep evidence from being seen
by Defendants, upstairs.
32. In 2008 mid-year Plaintiffs family members have had their cars tampered with by the Defendants.
33. In mid year 2007 unitl present Plaintiff has had his phones tapped by defendants.
34. Since Sept. 2007 unitl present Plaintiff has had his computer created with fake websites and has
had had his emails blocked from reaching their destinations.
35. Plaintiff has had the two state area put on a watch him type military status from mid
2007 until present by the defendants.
36. Employers have been asked not to hire the plaintiff by the Defendants.
37. From mid 2007 until present.Plaintiffs have been attempting to create a blackball situation
with the help of several agencies.
38. The defendants have used their power to stop government agencies from doing their jobs
where the Plaintiff is concerned.
39. Plaintiff has been subjected to actions of discrimination because of the actions of the Defendants
spreading harassing rumors.
40. Plaintiff is followed every day everyplace he goes, by the Defendants.
41. Plaintiff has been told by a Kenosha Detective because of the Defendants being who they are,
that they would not do their job.
42. Plaintiff has filed complaints thru multiple police stations with no assistance because of who the
Police say the Defendants are.
43. Plaintiff has had every aspect of his privacy invaded by the Defendants, from cameras to taps.
44. Plaintiffs daughter has been put in a position for abuse to take place by direct actions of the Defendnants.
45. Plaintiffs daughter has been questioned without the Parents permission at school, she is 5 years
old.
46. Plaintiff has had his phone calls rerouted to people who were not the real contacts.
47. Plaintiff has been targeted by the Defendants because of corruption from Chicago.
48. Plaintiff has come home to find his garage has been broken into with electronic code readers
and they leave the garage lights on to run up my bill and have me being charged extra.
49. I have them playing with my internet service by calling and disabling it regularly with their fake
websites.
50. The defendants now know from hacking my computer they are being sued and are asking
everyone to try a different lie that they have talked to.
51. Plaintiffs is leaving the two States that are in this conspiracy together and will be speaking before
the U.S. Senate about these issues so they can never happen again to Americans.
52. Plaintiff was told by a video store employee that the military was running around and wish they could
shoot me, now his video store is closed, located on 52nd st. Lion Video.
53. Plaintiffs wife has lied in Illinois state court writing statements that are lies verifiable thru the true sources,
one being my daughters daycare, as far as her being taken by defendants from school.

THE WITNESSES

Which thru discovery have the pertinent information to prove or assist in proving violations,

who have dirct or indirect knowledge of events:
1) Piaintiff s Darryl Kinney and Jada Simone Kinney are of African American descent
and at this time Darryl Kinney and Jada Simone Kinney in Kenosha,WI
2) President George W. Bush located in the White House in Washington, D.C.
Vice President Dick Chaney in Washington, D.C.
Defendants Dept. of Justice is localed in Wisconsin and all over the United States
including Washington. D.C..
Don Kinney, Eric Kinney located in Kansas.
Barack Obama located in Washington, D.C.(IL)

City of Kenosha Police Dept. located Kenosha and includes the Mayors office.
Sen. Barbara Mills in Washington (MD)
REV. Al Sharpton located in New York.
ACLU located in Wisconsin and every U.S. state.
Senator Ryan in Washington D.C. (WI)
Sen. Dick Durbin un Washington (IL).
Sen. Feingold in Washington (WI)
Speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi located in Washington, D.C.
Wendy Martin of the Wisconsin EEOC branch.
Waukegan Police Dept. located in Waukegan Jll.
Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s Chicago office located in Chicago and
Springfield,IL.
18)Defendants Dept. of Revenue Illinois located in Illinois.
The U.S. Dept. of Justice located in Wisconsin and Washington, D.
The FBI located in Kansas and Chicago and Washington, D.C.
NAACP located in Illinois and throughout the U.S.
Chicago Tribune located in Chicago,Ill.
22) And a list of 100 to be inserted at end as witness or Defendants
23) Chanel 6 News located in Wisconsin and New Jersey
24) CNN news located in New Jersey.
25) Computer Exchange located in Kenosha and Milwaukee.

26) Sears and A&E a subsidiary of Sears nationwide and Wisconsin.
27) Katrina Kigoda the upstairs criminal hacker house.
28) Judge Barbara Kluka Kenosha Circuit Court.
29) Senate Budget Committee.
30) Ms. Barnes Pricipal Patti Cake daycare.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Kinney respectfully request that the court:
1. Enter judgment that D.O.J. and the I.R.S. have violated Kinneys rights under foremention laws and statutes.
2. Enter a judgment for damages of $50,000,000.00 for all violation including emotional and other abuses under
the laws forementioned, which includes Punitive and Compensatory damages.
3. Pay for any reasonable legal Assistance from lawyers or otherwise incurred during this process.
4. Order that Defendants pay for lost wages and travel expenses from state to state cost, including
interest, in an amout to be shown at trial.
5. Order that Defendants pay for future lost wages in an amout to be shown at trial.
6. Order the public apology over a T.V. Broadcast for the defamation of professional and personal relationships lost
because of thier actions.
7. Grant Kinney such other and further relief as is just.

respectfully submitted,
Plaintiff Pro Se
______________________________
Darryl Kinney
signed & dated

Comment by DARRYL — July 24, 2008 #

About this Site:

TeleClick.ca

Telecommunications Industry News