<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype 2.0 for Mac and Linux Users: Coming Soon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/</link>
	<description>Daily news bulletin of notable events in the telecommunications industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiggie</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-64470</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-64470</guid>
		<description>Skype for Linux is terribly horrible! It&#039;s so so incredibly ugly, i wouldn&#039;t be able to do such horrible application even if i tried!. Windows&#039; is fine, &quot;of course&quot;... I can live with the fact that I would use MSN at Linux for video chats, since most features are missing at Linux... ye, don&#039;t even mention to me the deprecated OSS use T_T!! but oh my, look how it ruins my interfase:

http://img402.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotzt6.png

this is why i don&#039;t use Skype at Linux, i tell ppl to go on msn (even if i hate M$ =P).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype for Linux is terribly horrible! It&#8217;s so so incredibly ugly, i wouldn&#8217;t be able to do such horrible application even if i tried!. Windows&#8217; is fine, &#8220;of course&#8221;&#8230; I can live with the fact that I would use MSN at Linux for video chats, since most features are missing at Linux&#8230; ye, don&#8217;t even mention to me the deprecated OSS use T_T!! but oh my, look how it ruins my interfase:</p>
<p><a href="http://img402.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotzt6.png" rel="nofollow">http://img402.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotzt6.png</a></p>
<p>this is why i don&#8217;t use Skype at Linux, i tell ppl to go on msn (even if i hate M$ =P).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-840</guid>
		<description>I would love to use this product if it does what is promises.
Right now it has soms hick ups on Linux/Windows calls.
I think ALSA support is essential.
Implementing Video conferencing for Linux and Mac too, could very well make Skype very popular, grabbing great market share from msn!
I would love to see that.

Opensourcing it could very well give development a boost vor Symbian and other platform.
Why not keep control of projects by placing Skype people there and focus on commercial income from services and support?

Anyway, I know for sure when no good Symbian or Linux/Mac version will be produced, some opensource VOIP product might take marketshare in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to use this product if it does what is promises.<br />
Right now it has soms hick ups on Linux/Windows calls.<br />
I think ALSA support is essential.<br />
Implementing Video conferencing for Linux and Mac too, could very well make Skype very popular, grabbing great market share from msn!<br />
I would love to see that.</p>
<p>Opensourcing it could very well give development a boost vor Symbian and other platform.<br />
Why not keep control of projects by placing Skype people there and focus on commercial income from services and support?</p>
<p>Anyway, I know for sure when no good Symbian or Linux/Mac version will be produced, some opensource VOIP product might take marketshare in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suckerass</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>suckerass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>I agree with last posts.  Skype is only a half-assed attempt on Linux.  For many reasons:
 * need to use skype_dsp_hijacker coz skype don&#039;t work with alsa nicely
http://juljas.net/linux/skype/
 * uses a sound format (iLBC) for voice mails that is not easily exported to mainstream formats
http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3951.txt
 * not ported to Familiar Linux so you have to use WinCE
 * clunky and ugly on Linux

I don&#039;t have a problem with running closed source apps on Linux.  If it does what I want, I&#039;ll pay money for it.  Until Skype for Linux stops sucking ass, I will continue looking for alternatives - free or non-free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with last posts.  Skype is only a half-assed attempt on Linux.  For many reasons:<br />
 * need to use skype_dsp_hijacker coz skype don&#8217;t work with alsa nicely<br />
<a href="http://juljas.net/linux/skype/" rel="nofollow">http://juljas.net/linux/skype/</a><br />
 * uses a sound format (iLBC) for voice mails that is not easily exported to mainstream formats<br />
<a href="http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3951.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3951.txt</a><br />
 * not ported to Familiar Linux so you have to use WinCE<br />
 * clunky and ugly on Linux</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with running closed source apps on Linux.  If it does what I want, I&#8217;ll pay money for it.  Until Skype for Linux stops sucking ass, I will continue looking for alternatives &#8211; free or non-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joolz</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>joolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 07:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>haha, skype for linux is a fucking joke. get us alsa before anything else. i mean, you cant even do smileys with a button in the linux version. whats up with that. that just shows how commited they are to platforms other than windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, skype for linux is a fucking joke. get us alsa before anything else. i mean, you cant even do smileys with a button in the linux version. whats up with that. that just shows how commited they are to platforms other than windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kool</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>kool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2005/12/skype-20-for-mac-and-linux-users-coming-soon/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>http://gizmoproject.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmoproject.com/" rel="nofollow">http://gizmoproject.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

