<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm Develops DVB-H Based Mobile TV Chips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/03/qualcomm-develops-dvb-h-based-mobile-tv-chips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/03/qualcomm-develops-dvb-h-based-mobile-tv-chips/</link>
	<description>Daily news bulletin of notable events in the telecommunications industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Dover</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/03/qualcomm-develops-dvb-h-based-mobile-tv-chips/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Dover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 19:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/03/qualcomm-develops-dvb-h-based-mobile-tv-chips/#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Maybe QCOM wouldn&#039;t have to bother w/ developing inferior technologies (UMTS, DVB-H) if Europe would simply abolish industrial policy in the wireless market &amp; allow free technology choice &amp; competition (as they supposedly committed to in WTO)... 

But no, they&#039;d rather be straight-jacketed w/ rip-off roaming rates, no free nights &amp; weekends, no free, unlimited in-network calling, blazing data speeds, etc....  all brought on by intense competition between operators using MULTIPLE technologies...

QCOM learned from UMTS?  They only reason why those chuckleheads in Europe develpoped UMTS was that they saw that CDMA was superior to GSM...  and they needed to come up w/ a technology INCOMPATIBLE w/ CDMA2000...

The European operators could&#039;ve deployed EV/DO years ago, had better data speeds than they are just getting now through HSDPA upgrades, and it would&#039;ve only taken one third the spectrum (making CDMA2000 3X more effcient than HSDPA!!!)

I&#039;m glad I can just look across the Atlantic &amp; laugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe QCOM wouldn&#8217;t have to bother w/ developing inferior technologies (UMTS, DVB-H) if Europe would simply abolish industrial policy in the wireless market &amp; allow free technology choice &amp; competition (as they supposedly committed to in WTO)&#8230; </p>
<p>But no, they&#8217;d rather be straight-jacketed w/ rip-off roaming rates, no free nights &amp; weekends, no free, unlimited in-network calling, blazing data speeds, etc&#8230;.  all brought on by intense competition between operators using MULTIPLE technologies&#8230;</p>
<p>QCOM learned from UMTS?  They only reason why those chuckleheads in Europe develpoped UMTS was that they saw that CDMA was superior to GSM&#8230;  and they needed to come up w/ a technology INCOMPATIBLE w/ CDMA2000&#8230;</p>
<p>The European operators could&#8217;ve deployed EV/DO years ago, had better data speeds than they are just getting now through HSDPA upgrades, and it would&#8217;ve only taken one third the spectrum (making CDMA2000 3X more effcient than HSDPA!!!)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I can just look across the Atlantic &amp; laugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

