<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Passes IPTV Franchising Bill, But Ignores Net Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/05/congress-passes-iptv-franchising-bill-but-ignores-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/05/congress-passes-iptv-franchising-bill-but-ignores-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description>Daily news bulletin of notable events in the telecommunications industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Bank Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/05/congress-passes-iptv-franchising-bill-but-ignores-net-neutrality/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Bank Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 11:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2006/05/congress-passes-iptv-franchising-bill-but-ignores-net-neutrality/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that the big telecoms can appear to be for competition when talking about the national franchise laws, but in the same breath they are against Net Neutrality which is all about fair and expansive competiton.

I don&#039;t think the MSM reports can see that the telecoms are only for competiton when it is in their favor.  All they see is &quot;more cable companies must be good for competiton&quot; they don&#039;t stop to explore the Net Neutrality aspects or the fact that they all oppose municipal WiFi networks which would compete with their internet service.

-- Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that the big telecoms can appear to be for competition when talking about the national franchise laws, but in the same breath they are against Net Neutrality which is all about fair and expansive competiton.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the MSM reports can see that the telecoms are only for competiton when it is in their favor.  All they see is &#8220;more cable companies must be good for competiton&#8221; they don&#8217;t stop to explore the Net Neutrality aspects or the fact that they all oppose municipal WiFi networks which would compete with their internet service.</p>
<p>&#8211; Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

