<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogers, Bell, and Telus Sign Wireless &#8216;Code of Conduct&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2009/09/rogers-bell-and-telus-sign-wireless-code-of-conduct/</link>
	<description>Daily news bulletin of notable events in the telecommunications industry.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Smoke screen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2009/09/rogers-bell-and-telus-sign-wireless-code-of-conduct/#comment-286712</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.teleclick.ca/2009/09/rogers-bell-and-telus-sign-wireless-code-of-conduct/#comment-286712</guid>
					<description>How basically absurd in the first place.   The companies were by law already not allowed to change the terms of a SIGNED contract but yet they did anyway. All just " More PR and BS!" Also " Rogers is the worst culprit for their unrelenting repetitive telemarketing calls." " Just all more manure  to keep the related incompetent civil and public servants looking busy". Cellular firms get new customer rules but they still have not honoured all the old ones..
  
Most Consumer advocates don't think much of the new code. A code of conduct adopted by Canada’s cell phone service providers is a political answer that doesn’t address real consumer concerns, another competent  critic now has still charged .The code will be administered by the useless, pretentious  Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services, a body set up two years ago by the industry to negotiate disputes between customers and companies.    In its first year, 2007-08,   was still unable able to resolve  about 40  per cent, of the compalints according to its own website. About one-third of the complaints were related to wireless services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How basically absurd in the first place.   The companies were by law already not allowed to change the terms of a SIGNED contract but yet they did anyway. All just &#8221; More PR and BS!&#8221; Also &#8221; Rogers is the worst culprit for their unrelenting repetitive telemarketing calls.&#8221; &#8221; Just all more manure  to keep the related incompetent civil and public servants looking busy&#8221;. Cellular firms get new customer rules but they still have not honoured all the old ones..</p>
<p>Most Consumer advocates don&#8217;t think much of the new code. A code of conduct adopted by Canada’s cell phone service providers is a political answer that doesn’t address real consumer concerns, another competent  critic now has still charged .The code will be administered by the useless, pretentious  Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services, a body set up two years ago by the industry to negotiate disputes between customers and companies.    In its first year, 2007-08,   was still unable able to resolve  about 40  per cent, of the compalints according to its own website. About one-third of the complaints were related to wireless services.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
