<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogers, Bell, and Telus Sign Wireless &#8216;Code of Conduct&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleclick.ca/2009/09/rogers-bell-and-telus-sign-wireless-code-of-conduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2009/09/rogers-bell-and-telus-sign-wireless-code-of-conduct/</link>
	<description>Daily news bulletin of notable events in the telecommunications industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoke screen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleclick.ca/2009/09/rogers-bell-and-telus-sign-wireless-code-of-conduct/#comment-286712</link>
		<dc:creator>Smoke screen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleclick.ca/2009/09/rogers-bell-and-telus-sign-wireless-code-of-conduct/#comment-286712</guid>
		<description>How basically absurd in the first place.   The companies were by law already not allowed to change the terms of a SIGNED contract but yet they did anyway. All just &quot; More PR and BS!&quot; Also &quot; Rogers is the worst culprit for their unrelenting repetitive telemarketing calls.&quot; &quot; Just all more manure  to keep the related incompetent civil and public servants looking busy&quot;. Cellular firms get new customer rules but they still have not honoured all the old ones..
  
Most Consumer advocates don&#039;t think much of the new code. A code of conduct adopted by Canadaâ€™s cell phone service providers is a political answer that doesnâ€™t address real consumer concerns, another competent  critic now has still charged .The code will be administered by the useless, pretentious  Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services, a body set up two years ago by the industry to negotiate disputes between customers and companies.    In its first year, 2007-08,   was still unable able to resolve  about 40  per cent, of the compalints according to its own website. About one-third of the complaints were related to wireless services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How basically absurd in the first place.   The companies were by law already not allowed to change the terms of a SIGNED contract but yet they did anyway. All just &#8221; More PR and BS!&#8221; Also &#8221; Rogers is the worst culprit for their unrelenting repetitive telemarketing calls.&#8221; &#8221; Just all more manure  to keep the related incompetent civil and public servants looking busy&#8221;. Cellular firms get new customer rules but they still have not honoured all the old ones..</p>
<p>Most Consumer advocates don&#8217;t think much of the new code. A code of conduct adopted by Canadaâ€™s cell phone service providers is a political answer that doesnâ€™t address real consumer concerns, another competent  critic now has still charged .The code will be administered by the useless, pretentious  Commissioner for Complaints for Telecommunications Services, a body set up two years ago by the industry to negotiate disputes between customers and companies.    In its first year, 2007-08,   was still unable able to resolve  about 40  per cent, of the compalints according to its own website. About one-third of the complaints were related to wireless services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

